November 2013 Board Meeting Minutes

Facilitated by ENA Interim President Brad & Leigh Archbold’s home
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Meeting started at 6:30 at Brad Archbold’s home


Attendance

  • Board Members:  Sherry Chilcutt, Mitch Dennis, Brad Archbold, Nathan Allan, Sandia Slaby, Pat Bayle, Katy & Andrew Beattie, Whitney Bowerman

Community Garden at New Bridge Church

Sandia reported on the meeting that took place on September 29th at New Bridge Community Church with two members of the church, Doug Danville & Rhonda Davis (grounds care coordinator) to explore the possibilities of a community garden being established on the church property. The aim of this meeting was to tour potential sites on their property for a community garden. The gist of that meeting is a follows:

  • Two places two places were identified by Rhonda & Doug where some garden boxes could be placed where there is or could be water accessibility for irrigation, the one with easier access & seemingly more favored by the reps the church is on the ‘bench’ on top of the west facing slope along Central out front of the building.
  • We discussed things like the number of beds that would fit in that area (over 15), the need to fence it in (and that the church may be willing to put up $$ for such fencing), chemicals that the grounds maintenance company has used on the grass there in the last few years, access for bringing in the supplies to build such beds, and that the church thinks there are probably some members that would participate in work parties to create such beds. I stated that we know little yet about the actual numbers of people in the neighborhood who are interested enough to actually fully participating in a community garden project on any level.
  • We ended the meeting with Doug & Rhonda agreeing to find out more info from the church about the commitments they as an institution can make to this project,and about the specific herbicides that have been used since New Bridge has been on the property. Meta & I agreed to evaluate if there is energy from ENA members to spearhead this project. Sandia said she’d been awaiting further info from New Bridge before beginning that evaluation. (But after the meeting she has said that since that info from the church is being slow to manifest, she will put a question out on the ENA website and Nextdoor to inquire generally about interest from ENA residents in participating in a community garden project there.)

Trails Update

Brad gave an update on the trail proposals that the ENA had submitted to the City of Olympia’s neighborhood trail program..  The proposal we submitted involving a trail between 13th & Eastside St. is now on hold, and the proposal for the McCormick to Central trail is to be withdrawn due to wetland issues (Indian Creek).  This could possibly be made if  a bridge were built over the wetland, but the building of such a structure is beyond the scope of the city trail program to begin with.

Membership & Dues

Our treasurer, Sherry Chilcutt, reported that there are 30 paying member households in our ENA, which is out of over one thousand (1000) households in our entire ENA region.

We discussed the value of there being this existing (ENA) organization, with one person stating how “we don’t know how valuable it is until we need it”, until we really need one another, and then being connected already can really be helpful; that if we weren’t already organized, it could be much more difficult to communicate or work together, especially promptly or efficiently. It was pointed out that it was the city of Olympia that identified & organized these existing neighborhoods as they are, & then associations were formed to represent the residents therein. It is through these associations & their members/ boards that the city communicates with it’s residents. If we as residents want to be informed of specifically of city business, events, or decisions that effect the southeast neighborhood without each one of us calling or going to City Hall frequently & inquiring, an ENA needs to exist, since the City relays such information to elected neighborhood association Boards, when there is one.

We then discussed 1) the need to explore both what we want this organization to be & do for us beyond being the conduit for the dissemination of information from the City, and 2) how we might involve our residents in exploring that last idea, and how to inform & educate the average resident also about the above mentioned value/need for a neighborhood association.

We discussed writing up some of these ideas about the value of neighborhood association, and including it in an ENA newsletter to reach more people with these points. But in discussing that idea, the treasurer confirmed that we would use about all we currently have in our general fund (which comes from the paying household memberships) plus the credit we have with our printer to print one newsletter. So, it was unanimous that we should increase our paying membership before we can afford to publish an actual newsletter size publication.

We discussed the online payment capability, and the need to get that established on the ENA website (we approved that & it was close to happening last year, but didn’t get accomplished). There was unanimous support for that to happen.

Our supporting membership dues has been $10/year for over a decade.

Treasurer’s Report

Checking balance $150.56
Savings account $528.40
Neighborhood Signs $1295.73
Legion Way Trees $150.99
Community Beautification $504.53
Long term Savings CD $1027.76

Newsletter Distribution

Sandia reported that she’d gotten the list of our past newsletter distributors & their routes from Ruth Middlebrook, and this info is available, as needed.  Sandia agreed to call (or email) the people on the list to assess their interest & availability to continue with the task of hand distributing written ENA correspondence to EN residents, which was in the form of newsletters until early in 2012.

It was unanimously agreed  that we would print up a postcard size notice following our January Board meeting, which will be distributed by hand to EN residents to notify & invite folks to the Annual General Membership meeting in February. At that meeting we have Board elections & we already know that we will at least have an opening position for a new President (as Luke Bowerman stepped down last Aug. & Brad Archbold, who is serving as Interim President, will not be a candidate for the next term as Board President).

Neighborhood Boundaries

The question of the region between Plum Street & Eastside,  and 4th Ave &  the freeway was discussed,  as it was raised months back that we consider asking the city to annex that region into the ENA’s.  This is being considered, because that region, though officially within the Downtown Neighborhood Association, isn’t accurately represented many residents & business owners there say (they do not associate themselves as being part of  downtown). What occurs in that region affects our neighborhood more than it does downtown. Brad will contact a city rep to inquire about what the  process would be to request annexation into the ENA.

Neighborhood Boundaries

A new homeless shelter for young adults 18-24 years of age is being built near our neighborhood by Community Youth Services, who purchased a building at Legion & Pear. CYS has requested a change in zoning, and there is not a conditional use permit process in the plan, thus it was discussed that it would be good if we had a rep. attending those planning meetings. No one volunteered, though the importance of us having someone there for the city to see there is ENA interest in this project & proposals related.

Is there anyone in the neighborhood interested & available to attend planning meetings for this Community Youth Services shelter project, to keep the ENA apprised of issues that clearly are of interest or/and will effect us, & to represent the ENA?

Problem Properties

We had a discussion on problem properties that code and law enforcement have been requested to evaluate.

Next Meeting

Pat Bayle will host our January Board meeting on January 15, 2014 from 6:30-7:30. He lives at 1402 13th Ave SE, west of Central, across from the community gardens on 13th. His phone number is (360) 561-3143.

Meeting adjourned at 7:33 pm.

August 19 Public Forum re: Low-Barrier Shelter Minutes

On Monday August 19 a Public Forum was held at St. Michael’s Church regarding the low-barrier shelter proposed for 1011 10th Ave.

Meeting started at 7:00 pm.

A brief overview of the process that would be used to elicit feedback from the forum attendees was provided by the 3rd party facilitator.


Concerned Eastside Neighbors expressed issues regarding the project and the lack of communication around it, and distributed a handout A Message from Concerned Eastside Neighbors.

A 10-minute presentation was provided by Interfaith Works and several handouts were distributed, The Peoples House FAQ’sPeople’s House TimelineSexual Violence Stats and Registered Offender Map 8.19.13.

Forum attendees were asked to work in small groups to answer two questions:

1. What are your concerns about the project?

2. What are your hopes for the project?

Following the small group work, groups presented their concerns and hopes, which was followed by a short Q & A session. Interfaith Works stated that due to time constraints they would respond in writing to the concerns and hopes and the Q & A questions in “one or two weeks.” When a response is received it will be posted to the ENA website.

Below is a list of the concerns and hopes that were expressed:

Concerns

Location
Schools were not part of the criteria
If there is a large neighbourhood opposition, would you find another site?
How close sex offenders can be to schools
Concern about staffing levels
Limits on length of stays
Timeline for this process
Cost of supervision of kids at recess, specifically schools
Decrease in property values of Eastside residents
Too many services in this neighbourhood
Lack of public process
St. mike’s having a public process
Anyone can access this with all the kids
A lot of times sex offenders don’t even register
Empty beds at other shelters
$400,000 taken away from rapid rehousing, which helps children and families
Olympia is bearing a big load
Historically our neighbourhood has felt disenfranchised, this would continue that
Concern about centralization of services
What additional police resources will be available to the shelter
Increase crime
Research about placing LBS in neighborhoods
Concern about it being 24 hour access
Policies and procedures will be developed later…that should be done now
Number and kind of trained staff
Shelter becoming a dumping ground for those rejected from other shelters
How will those high risk groups interact with each other
Sex offenders self reporting
Offenders near schools
Who is on the board for interfaith that lives within four blocks of this shelter
Funding after this year
Process is moving to fast – disorganized, short-sighted, need to slow down/step back and look at overal county/city plan to address homelessness
Poor planning by city/county- they need to take responsibility to address homelessness

Hopes

We hope it’s not located here
Maybe people will have a place to go
Not near or in residential neighborhoods
People can be successful finding a place to stay
People will have a place to stay come winter
Public restrooms
We see ourselves as part of the solution
Already are sex offenders and that they would have resources
Safety for all is paramount
Have this kind of turn out to work with the shelter!
Make sure they follow through
Professional support
City/county will address homelessness holistically, with all stakeholders involved
The community at large could be a resource in helping resolve these issues, with City/County leading the charge
Meeting adjourned 8:30 pm